UNDERSTANDING “BABYLON FIVE” (4.06) “INTO THE FIRE”
My opinion of “Into the Fire” had always been somewhat lukewarm in the past. When I first saw it, I assumed it would be another episode that featured a large-scale battle – similar to episodes like (1.13) “Signs and Portents”, (3.10) “Severed Dreams” and(4.15) “No Surrender, No Retreat”. There were battle sequences featured in “Into the Fire”, but to the extent that I would consider it an action-heavy episode.
Sue me. I was young and stupid in those days. I thought a top-notch “BABYLON FIVE” episode should always consist of a large-scale battle. But I finally saw the light. I finally understood what “Into the Fire” was really about. Well, I take that back. I have always understood since I first saw it. But I was so disappointed by the lack of a real battle that I allowed the message to pass over my head.
But not this time. Anticipating to be bored out of my mind, I finally allowed J. Michael Straczynski’s message to filter through. I finally understood and accepted the messages about parental or colonial figures letting go and allowing the young – whether they were individuals or nations to grow in their own ways. And in the end, it brought tears to my eyes. Much to my surprise. Thank you Mr. Straczynski for a first-rate television episode. And please accept my apologies for allowing so many years to pass before finally getting the message.
Filed under: Essay | Tagged: andreas katsulas, babylon 5, bill mumy, bruce boxleitner, claudia christian, ed wasser, j. michael straczynski, jason carter, mira furlan, patricia tallman, peter jurasik, politics, richard biggs, stephen furst, television |